For quite some time now, Michel Platini - The President of UEFA has been expressing his feelings on the crazy money going around through transfers. I admire the fact that, he realises this cannot go on. I also admire the fact that he wants to do something about it.
But a week back, I was flabbergasted. Michel Platini came out and confirmed that he had the support of many club owners in his fight against the crazy transfers. One of the few mentioned was a certain Mr. Roman Abromavic. In fact, Platini went as far as saying that it was Mr. Roman who had initiated the talk regarding the crazy transfers. I was shell-shocked - at the hypocrisy.
Wasn't it a certain Mr. Abromavic who inflated the market with his millions a few years ago? And now that, the credit crunch has hit him too, and the fact that he cannot spend like he did once before, he doesn't like/want others who have the money, to spend?
I am all for the cause. However, I cannot and will not accept the support of the man who apparently initiated the move.
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
What's next?
I was waiting for the official confirmation of Eduardo's ban to make this post official.
Apparently, Eduardo has been given a two match ban for diving. More precisely, Eduardo was trying to influence the decision of the referee by diving.
According to me, this is absolute rubbish. UEFA should be ashamed of this decision. What about players feigning injury to get a player booked/sent off? What about players appealing for a throw-in/corner even though they know that they touched the ball last?
Don't these incidents/actions count as influencing the decision of the referee? Would UEFA take action on these players as well?
In my opinion, a referee is there to make decisions based on what he sees and not based on what players appeal for. If a referee feels he has been influenced by the player or any other external force, I'm sorry to say, he shouldn't be in a referee's shirt.
UEFA should stand up, look in the mirror and slap themselves into reality. This is the most ridiculous decision I've ever come across. Yet.
Apparently, Eduardo has been given a two match ban for diving. More precisely, Eduardo was trying to influence the decision of the referee by diving.
According to me, this is absolute rubbish. UEFA should be ashamed of this decision. What about players feigning injury to get a player booked/sent off? What about players appealing for a throw-in/corner even though they know that they touched the ball last?
Don't these incidents/actions count as influencing the decision of the referee? Would UEFA take action on these players as well?
In my opinion, a referee is there to make decisions based on what he sees and not based on what players appeal for. If a referee feels he has been influenced by the player or any other external force, I'm sorry to say, he shouldn't be in a referee's shirt.
UEFA should stand up, look in the mirror and slap themselves into reality. This is the most ridiculous decision I've ever come across. Yet.
Monday, August 31, 2009
Money over Tradition?
This past weekend, the second best league in the world was back. And how?
Real Madrid played Deportivo in the opening fixture of this season's La Liga. The galacticos had a chance to show what fans can expect for the rest of the season.
But, my attention was drawn not to the result and the performance, but to the goalscorers. One goalscorer in particular. Christiano Ronaldo.
Ronaldo scored his first competitive goal for Madrid - from the penalty spot. Now, what bothers me is, why/how did Ronaldo get the nod to take the penalty over Raul who was the regular penalty taker for so many years? Raul is such an icon at Madrid that, even when Raul was not performing, he was not even considered for a transfer.
Has Ronaldo edged ahead of Raul as the first choice for taking penalties? Is this a marketing strategy for Madrid? Is there a clause in his contract regarding this? Who knows?
Real Madrid played Deportivo in the opening fixture of this season's La Liga. The galacticos had a chance to show what fans can expect for the rest of the season.
But, my attention was drawn not to the result and the performance, but to the goalscorers. One goalscorer in particular. Christiano Ronaldo.
Ronaldo scored his first competitive goal for Madrid - from the penalty spot. Now, what bothers me is, why/how did Ronaldo get the nod to take the penalty over Raul who was the regular penalty taker for so many years? Raul is such an icon at Madrid that, even when Raul was not performing, he was not even considered for a transfer.
Has Ronaldo edged ahead of Raul as the first choice for taking penalties? Is this a marketing strategy for Madrid? Is there a clause in his contract regarding this? Who knows?
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Know the difference?
There is one particular aspect of football that has me going berserk every time it happens. Well, who am I kidding? There are many aspects of football which makes me go berserk. Here's one of them.
There were two incidents in the Manchester United-Arsenal game which I would like to point out. One was the incident where Fletcher threw himself at Arshavin in the penalty box and Fletcher got the ball after he got the man.
Then, minutes later, there was another incident where Diaby took down Evra with a similar challenge outside the area.
This was the conversation between Martin Tyler and Andy Gray after the second of those incidents.
Martin : You know the difference?
Andy : Ya, I know the difference. One was inside the penalty box and the other wasn't.
One was given as a foul and the other wasn't. No points for guessing which was given.
There were two incidents in the Manchester United-Arsenal game which I would like to point out. One was the incident where Fletcher threw himself at Arshavin in the penalty box and Fletcher got the ball after he got the man.
Then, minutes later, there was another incident where Diaby took down Evra with a similar challenge outside the area.
This was the conversation between Martin Tyler and Andy Gray after the second of those incidents.
Martin : You know the difference?
Andy : Ya, I know the difference. One was inside the penalty box and the other wasn't.
One was given as a foul and the other wasn't. No points for guessing which was given.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Wake up!!!!
The start of the EPL season has been very very weird for quite a few reasons. Here are some of them off the top of my head.
1. Spurs are top of the league.
2. There has not been a deflected goal from Lampard yet.
3. There has been only one draw in three rounds of EPL games.
4. Burnley beat Manchester United.
5. Liverpool have lost twice in the first three matches.
6. Michael Owen is in an United shirt.
7. The only person to be sent off in the EPL so far is Sammy Lee (Assistant Manager of Liverpool).
8. Adebayor has scored two in two games.
9. Arsenal have started shooting from distance.
10. Bolton are trying to play football.
Oh, and did I mention Spurs are TOP of the league?
Am I dreaming? Nightmare? Will normal service be restored? I need to wake up...Quick...
1. Spurs are top of the league.
2. There has not been a deflected goal from Lampard yet.
3. There has been only one draw in three rounds of EPL games.
4. Burnley beat Manchester United.
5. Liverpool have lost twice in the first three matches.
6. Michael Owen is in an United shirt.
7. The only person to be sent off in the EPL so far is Sammy Lee (Assistant Manager of Liverpool).
8. Adebayor has scored two in two games.
9. Arsenal have started shooting from distance.
10. Bolton are trying to play football.
Oh, and did I mention Spurs are TOP of the league?
Am I dreaming? Nightmare? Will normal service be restored? I need to wake up...Quick...
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Disgruntled
After a lean couple of weeks in terms of the blog scenario, I'm back. I did not have any words to write after the first game of the season.
Well, let me rephrase that. I did not have any words that did not include unparliamentary language. Now that I've got my head straight, I'll dive into the football. To be more precise, I'll dive into Liverpool.
There's no points for guessing why I was not in the right mood after the opening round of fixtures. Liverpool lost in terms of the result and they got beat in terms of the football. The loss of Alonso was there for all to see. Also, the formation seemed all wrong. Gerrard in the hole behind Torres seemed extremely wrong without Alonso. I agree that Lucas is a different player to Alonso. But shouldn't that mean Liverpool alter their play too? There was talk about Gerrard dropping back to midfield in a traditional 4-4-2 and playing Voronin up front with Torres. But all such talk was quashed when Lucas was named "Star of the pre-season". Well, something didn't quite add up with that statement. I have given lots of stick to Lucas in the past and let me assure you I will stick with that. Last night's result against Stoke might have eased the tension but does not prove anything yet. The jury is still out.
Disclaimer : As a football fan, my thoughts might have been different.
Well, let me rephrase that. I did not have any words that did not include unparliamentary language. Now that I've got my head straight, I'll dive into the football. To be more precise, I'll dive into Liverpool.
There's no points for guessing why I was not in the right mood after the opening round of fixtures. Liverpool lost in terms of the result and they got beat in terms of the football. The loss of Alonso was there for all to see. Also, the formation seemed all wrong. Gerrard in the hole behind Torres seemed extremely wrong without Alonso. I agree that Lucas is a different player to Alonso. But shouldn't that mean Liverpool alter their play too? There was talk about Gerrard dropping back to midfield in a traditional 4-4-2 and playing Voronin up front with Torres. But all such talk was quashed when Lucas was named "Star of the pre-season". Well, something didn't quite add up with that statement. I have given lots of stick to Lucas in the past and let me assure you I will stick with that. Last night's result against Stoke might have eased the tension but does not prove anything yet. The jury is still out.
Disclaimer : As a football fan, my thoughts might have been different.
Friday, July 31, 2009
Have a good one, Sir Bobby
It is indeed a sad day in the world of football. One of the legends of the sport has passed away leaving behind fans all over the world in shock and in mourning.
Sir Bobby Robson was one of the most loved personalities both among the footballing industry and among the fans. His charisma, his dedication to the sport and his fantastic work ethic made him one of the respected people in his generation. I remember Steve Mcmahon once mention that Sir Bobby played a round of golf (18 holes), immediately came to the studio, worked for 8 straight hours and he looked as fresh as ever. And he was 74. That says it all.
John Travolta's quote about Phoenix in the hit movie Ladder 49 can be compared to the following quote. Sir Bobby loved football and gave his life to football. Let us all celebrate the life of Sir Bobby Robson.
Rest in Peace, Sir Bobby...
Sir Bobby Robson was one of the most loved personalities both among the footballing industry and among the fans. His charisma, his dedication to the sport and his fantastic work ethic made him one of the respected people in his generation. I remember Steve Mcmahon once mention that Sir Bobby played a round of golf (18 holes), immediately came to the studio, worked for 8 straight hours and he looked as fresh as ever. And he was 74. That says it all.
John Travolta's quote about Phoenix in the hit movie Ladder 49 can be compared to the following quote. Sir Bobby loved football and gave his life to football. Let us all celebrate the life of Sir Bobby Robson.
Rest in Peace, Sir Bobby...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)